A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours more than the construction of a wall in a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted national awareness next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times report about René Collier and the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has developed right into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to make their family members household. The case has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of established inhabitants. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Distinctive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore spots are subject to strict controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, specifically in a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the proper situation. Their authorized team has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their see, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, where views of the sea are both hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-substantial drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that become emblematic of the depth of your dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain visual evidence of the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Times documented, describing how the two men entered the drinking water all through severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the location became The most putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being protected in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second inside the authorized timeline.
On the core of your dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has actually been described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances attached to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental security and adherence to preparing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it's about ensuring that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got described their extended-standing link to the realm and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple just seeking to create a family members household in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Location of Conservation and say that all is effective are carried out determined by professional assistance and authorised designs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea through a storm, usually do not change the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description to get a circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively typical. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Periods article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been involved in area advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by means of midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting both of those the Bodily actuality on the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal approach.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court will have to establish whether or not the wall as constructed complies with planning permission and whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning ailments. Nonetheless the human element stays central: neighbours who should Dwell along with one another very long following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction functions at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.