A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their scheduling authorization by creating a wall over and above the boundaries of their site, bringing about an encroachment over a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-large water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the location turned one of the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject Irish Times article about René Collier promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically trying to build a family members house in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Unique Region of Conservation and say that all operates have already been completed determined by Skilled tips and accredited options. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into The ocean all through a storm, never change the fundamental information.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.