A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their planning permission by building a wall beyond the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, particularly within a delicate coastal atmosphere such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the correct situation. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-substantial drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Instances documented, describing how the two Adult males entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment inside the lawful timeline.
Within the Main of your dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as René Collier and Paul Feely constructed, goes past what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives property in accordance Together with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and authorised ideas. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean in the course of a storm, do not change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal technique.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.